editor decision started nature rejection

Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. So dont feel upset! Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). [CDATA[// > Is it possible to rotate a window 90 degrees if it has the same length and width? Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. Editors, on the other hand, must guard against a different category of mistake, as it is their responsibility to balance the intense investment of the authors in a particular decision against the more diffuse interests not only of their readers but also of other authors. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. The first thing to do when you get a rejection is to take a deep breath and consider your options. A final decision of acceptance or rejection of the revised manuscript is made by the editors as soon as they conclude that they have sufficient information at hand for doing so. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. My thesis aimed to study dynamic agrivoltaic systems, in my case in arboriculture. In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? It is up to the editor whether to accept or reject. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. If Nature's editors agree to reconsider a paper, the other original referee(s) will have the chance to see and comment on the report of the referee who is the subject of the complaint. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Unfortunately, as a freelancer, it comes with the job. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . 2. good . Stage 2: Editor assigned. Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Nature (Nature) We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be? In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Rejections based on serious errors are frustrating for authors and damaging to the journal's credibility, and so we have a procedure for reconsidering decisions at the author's request. [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. Second reason: methodological approach and results. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. ISSN 1097-6256 (print). and JavaScript. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. ii a. I gave them his address. You don't need to, and shouldn't, make a rash decision. Because the 'quality' of a manuscript is not a linear variable, editorial decisions invariably have a subjective component. How to match a specific column position till the end of line? [CDATA[// >Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Improve this answer. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? I am at the same stage. 771 BCE: Start of the Eastern Zhou dynasty (and the 'Spring and Autumn Annals' period) in China 753 BCE: The Founding of Rome 594 BCE: Solon is appointed archon of Athens and proposes popular reforms; a system of land taxation introduced in the state of Lu, China 575 BCE: Servius Tullius becomes King of Rome 560 BCE: Peisistratus seizes the Acropolis, makes himself tyrant of Athens, but is . Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? Hello. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. "Advice please! The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. //-->

German Surnames In Jamaica, Who Played The Original Derwin Davis On Girlfriends, Revlon Persian Melon Lipstick Dupe, Arnold Friedman Death, Articles E